Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/5191/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax...

Itxa/5191/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (Exemption ) v. Shivaji Park Gymkhana

High Court 07 Dec 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5191/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (Exemption ) v. Shivaji Park Gymkhana
Date of order
07 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/5191/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (Exemption ) v. Shivaji Park Gymkhana, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Both the appeals are dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2498 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2505 OF2009 Director of Income Tax (Exemption) ..Appellant. V/s. Shivaji Park Gymkhana..Respondent. Ms. Suchitra Kamble for appellant. Mr. Nishant Thakkar with Rajesh Poojari for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the revenue and learned counsel for the respondent. We were taken through the impugned order. The Tribunal has followed the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of CIT V/s. Bankipur Club Ltd. reported in (1997) 226 ITR 97 (SC)and considered the same in para No.14 of the impugned order. The said judgment has been accepted by the revenue and no case is made out to distinguish the same. Having gone through the same, we do find any substantial question of law arise in these appeals. Both the appeals are dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan