Itxa/519/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax , Central -2 v. Shri Dixant Sharma
High Court
24 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/519/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax , Central -2 v. Shri Dixant Sharma
Date of order
24 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/519/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax , Central -2 v. Shri Dixant Sharma, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 519 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-2, Mumbai
.. Appellant
v/s.
Shri. Dixant Sharma
..Respondent
Mr. A.R. Malhotra for the appellant Mr. A.K. Jasani for the respondent
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 24[th] NOVEMBER, 2018.
1.This appeal challenges the order dated 13[th] March, 2015 passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2006-07.
2.Mr. Malhotra, learned Counsel appearing in support of the appealinvites our attention to the Circular No.3/2008 dated 11[th] July, 2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes which inter alia directs theRevenue not to press the pending appeals where the tax effect is lessthan Rs.50 lakhs.
3.In view of the above Circular, Mr. Malhotra has been instructed
not to press the appeal as the tax effect involved in the present appeal is
less than the threshold limits of Rs.50 lakhs.
4.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
5.Refund of Court Fees as per Rules.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.