In Itxa/5220/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 12 Mumbai v. New Maker Chamber Iv, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, both the appeals stand dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2514 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2515 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. New Maker Chamber IV..Respondent.
Mr. A.S. Shivsharan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Perused the appeals.
2.Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that the issue involved in the above appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Mittal Court Premises C0-Op. Society Ltd. (2009) reported in 184 Taxman 292 (Bom) against the Revenue. In this view of the matter, both the appeals stand dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue