Case Law › High Court › Itxa/522/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/522/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-City,Vi,Mum v. M/S Grasim Industries Ltd

High Court 05 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

05 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Itxa/522/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-City,Vi,Mum v. M/S Grasim Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Hence, appeals are rejected. .Parties to act on the copy of this order dulyauthenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary ofthe Court. .

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.451 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.522 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.926 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax,City VI, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai 20...Appellantv/sM/s Grasim Industries Ltd.,Worli, Mumbai 400 030 ...Respondents Mr J.S. Saluja for Appellant. Mr J.D. Mistry with Mr A.K. Jasani for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ.DATE : 5TH SEPTEMBER 2008 P.C.- 1.It is common ground that Income Tax AppealNo.860 of 2007 involving identical question has beenrejected. Hence, appeals are rejected. .Parties to act on the copy of this order dulyauthenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary ofthe Court. . Certified copy is expedited. ( D.K. DESHMUKH J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.