Itxa/5244/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 Mumbai v. Tokyo Plast International Ltd
High Court
16 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5244/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 Mumbai v. Tokyo Plast International Ltd
Date of order
16 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/5244/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 Mumbai v. Tokyo Plast International Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5244 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-8
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Tokyo Plast International Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ.
DATED : 16TH JUNE, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. None present for the respondent, though served.
2.Basically two questions are raised in this appeal and on both
the issues, ITAT has remanded the matter back to the file of the assessing officer to consider the issue in the light of the Special Bench decision in the case of M/s. Topman Exports and in the case of M/s. Lalsons 89 ITD 25. Since the Tribunal has remanded back the matter
to the file of the assessing officer, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. However, both the decisions relied upon by the Tribunal have been reversed by this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals reported in 328 ITR 451 and in the case of CIT V/s. Asian Star Co. Ltd. reported in [2010] 326 ITR 56. The assessing officer while passing fresh order as per the directions given by the ITAT order shall take into consideration the aforesaid judgments of this Court.
3.The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.