Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/525/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/525/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 Mumbai v. M/S. Banyan Tours And Travels Pvt. Ltd

High Court 24 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/525/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 Mumbai v. M/S. Banyan Tours And Travels Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
24 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/525/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 Mumbai v. M/S. Banyan Tours And Travels Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The appeal seeks to raise the following question of law :- "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty, levied by the assessing officer and confirmed by CIT(A) u/s.271(1)(c) amounting to Rs.20,46,433/-?" 2.

Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in imini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.525 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.525 OF 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Banyan Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Ms.Suchita Kamble for appellant. Ms.A.Vessanjee with S.J.Mehta for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. The appeal seeks to raise the following question of law :- "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty, levied by the assessing officer and confirmed by CIT(A) u/s.271(1)(c) amounting to Rs.20,46,433/-?" 2. It can be seen from the finding recorded by the Tribunal more particularly paragraph No.9 that there was no concealment on the part of the assessee to disclose the factual aspect. We do not see any reason to entertain this appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in imini with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan