In Itxa/525/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 Mumbai v. M/S. Banyan Tours And Travels Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The appeal seeks to raise the following question of law :- "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty, levied by the assessing officer and confirmed by CIT(A) u/s.271(1)(c) amounting to Rs.20,46,433/-?" 2.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in imini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.525 OF 2009
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.525 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Banyan Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Ms.Suchita Kamble for appellant.
Ms.A.Vessanjee with S.J.Mehta for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009.
DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the rival
parties. The appeal seeks to raise the following
question of law :-
"Whether on the facts and circumstances of
the case and in law, the ITAT was justified
in deleting the penalty, levied by the
assessing officer and confirmed by CIT(A)
u/s.271(1)(c) amounting to Rs.20,46,433/-?"
2. It can be seen from the finding recorded by
the Tribunal more particularly paragraph No.9 that
there was no concealment on the part of the assessee
to disclose the factual aspect. We do not see any
reason to entertain this appeal. Appeal is,
therefore, dismissed in imini with no order as to
costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.