Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/526/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/526/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Mumbai v. M/S Ceres Co.p. Ltd., Mumbai

High Court 24 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/526/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Mumbai v. M/S Ceres Co.p. Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
24 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/526/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Mumbai v. M/S Ceres Co.p. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The appeal seeks to raise the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in law in upholding the decision of the CIT(A) in directing to treat the loss on share trading as business loss; disregarding the provisions of Explanation to sec...

Decision: Appeal is thus dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.526 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.526 OF 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Ceres Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The appeal seeks to raise the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in law in upholding the decision of the CIT(A) in directing to treat the loss on share trading as business loss; disregarding the provisions of Explanation to sec. 73 of the I.T. Act ? " 2. Having gone through the findings recorded by the Tribunal, it is seen that it is finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal. Since the interest on dividend involved in this case is negligible, we see no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. Appeal is thus dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan