In Itxa/526/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Mumbai v. M/S Ceres Co.p. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The appeal seeks to raise the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in law in upholding the decision of the CIT(A) in directing to treat the loss on share trading as business loss; disregarding the provisions of Explanation to sec...
Decision: Appeal is thus dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.526 OF 2009
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.526 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Ceres Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The
appeal seeks to raise the following question of law:-
" Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the ITAT was
right in law in upholding the decision of
the CIT(A) in directing to treat the loss
on share trading as business loss;
disregarding the provisions of Explanation
to sec. 73 of the I.T. Act ? "
2. Having gone through the findings recorded
by the Tribunal, it is seen that it is finding of fact
recorded by the Tribunal. Since the interest on
dividend involved in this case is negligible, we see
no substantial question of law arise in this appeal.
Appeal is thus dismissed in limini with no order as to
costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.