In Itxa/529/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai - 24 v. M/S. Dkylark Video Vision, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, all the three appeals are dismissed. .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.528 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.529 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.577 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-24,Bandra (East), Mumbai 400 051...Appellantv/sM/s Skylark Video Vision,Goregaon (West), Mumbai 400 062 ...Respondents
Mr Ashokan for Appellant.
Mr Arun Sathye with Mr Mandar Vaidya and Ms S. Shendkar
for Respondents.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ.DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER 2008
P.C.-
1.
In all these appeals, the Tribunal has set
the Tribunal. Accordingly, all the three appeals are
dismissed.
.
Parties to act on the copy of this order duly
authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary ofthe Court.
.
Certified copy is expedited.
( D.K. DESHMUKH J.)
( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue