Case Law › High Court › Itxa/529/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/529/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nashik v. Sureshchandra Bakarmal Agrawal

High Court 29 Apr 2009 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

29 Apr 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/529/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nashik v. Sureshchandra Bakarmal Agrawal, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.529 OF 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.529 OF 2009 The Comissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Sureshchandra Bakarmal Agrawal ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 29TH APRIL, 2009. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 29TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Learned counsel for the revenue seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with no order as to costs. 2. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.