Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/530/2015 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of...

Itxa/530/2015 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 v. Sanghi Motors (Bom) Pvt. Ltd

High Court 22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/530/2015 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 v. Sanghi Motors (Bom) Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/530/2015 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 v. Sanghi Motors (Bom) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Revenue's appeal is, therefore, dismissed, but without any order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 530 OF 2015 Mr. Arvind Pinto for the appellant-absent. None for the respondent. CORAM :-S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.DATE :- JANUARY 22, 2018 P.C. :- 1.Mr. Arvind Pinto learned counsel appearing for the Revenue is absent. 2.This matter was heard earlier and was placed for passing orders. It was placed wrongly before two other courts and later on, when it was brought to the notice of those Division Benches that the matter was fully heard by this Bench and was placed only for dictation of final orders in the open court, the matter has been made over to us. 3.The Revenue is aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench at Mumbai. The six appeals dealt with by the tribunal have been disposed of on the ground that there are plethora of binding judgments and which have been followed and applied by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). In each of these judgments, the very principle that is followed and applied has been considered. In these circumstances, none of the questions that are proposed are substantial questions of law. The Revenue's appeal is, therefore, dismissed, but without any order as to costs. (SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan