Itxa/531/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-17Mum v. Mr Jayant Babulal Doshi
High Court
24 Apr 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/531/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-17Mum v. Mr Jayant Babulal Doshi
Date of order
24 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/531/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-17Mum v. Mr Jayant Babulal Doshi, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.531 OF 2009
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.531 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Mr.Jayant Babulal Doshi ..Respondent.
Mr.D.K.Kamwal for appellant.
Mr.B.V.Thavare with Priti Shukla for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the rival
parties. The appeal seeks to raise the following
questions of law :-
1) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the
case and in law, the Tribunal had erred in
quashing the order passed by CIT who had held
that the deductions allowed u/s.80IA / 80IB was
erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of
revenue ?
2) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the
case and in law, the Tribunal had erred in
quashing the order passed by the CIT who had
directed the assessing officer to withdraw the
deduction allowed u/s.80IA / 80IB of the Act ?
2. From the findings recorded by the Tribunal,
it is seen that the finding is based on appreciation
of evidence. Consequently, no question of law is
involved. The appeal is thus dismissed in limini with
no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.