In Itxa/532/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Remi Electronic Udyog Ltd, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is, accordingly,dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. .Needless to mention that the appellant-Revenue is entitled to refund of court fee as perlaw.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 532 OF 2004.
The Commissioner of Income-tax,Mumbai.... Appellant.V/s.M/s.Remi Electronic Udyog Ltd.Mumbai.... Respondents.A.S.Rao for the appellant.CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 17th July 2006.P.C. :----.On the motion made by learned counsel forthe appellant, appellant-Revenue is allowed withdraw this appeal. Appeal is, accordingly,dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
.Needless to mention that the appellant-Revenue is entitled to refund of court fee as perlaw.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue