Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/5323/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/5323/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -V Pune v. Antonio Faria

High Court 07 Dec 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5323/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -V Pune v. Antonio Faria
Date of order
07 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/5323/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -V Pune v. Antonio Faria, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1526 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Antonio Faria ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr. Prakash Shah i/b. PDS Legal for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the revenue stated that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Director ofIncome Tax (International Taxation) V/s. NGC Network Asia LLC reported in (2009) 222 CTR (Bom.) 86. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan