Itxa/5332/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 11 Mumbai v. Milind G. Vasudeo
High Court
31 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5332/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 11 Mumbai v. Milind G. Vasudeo
Date of order
31 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/5332/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 11 Mumbai v. Milind G. Vasudeo, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the above circumstances, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1571 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Milind G. Vasudeo
..Respondent.
Mr. Ram Upadhyay for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 31ST JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.The matter was on board twice and it was adjourned to today at the request of counsel holding that Mr. Upadhyay. Today again when the matter is called out, again a request is being for adjournment.
2.Moreover, Mr. Milind G. Vasudeo, respondent has expired a year back and hence the appeal has already abated. In the above circumstances, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue