Itxa/5334/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3 Mumbai v. Kotka Mahindra Finance Ltd
High Court
23 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5334/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3 Mumbai v. Kotka Mahindra Finance Ltd
Date of order
23 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/5334/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3 Mumbai v. Kotka Mahindra Finance Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1588 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Kotak Mahindra finance Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mrs. Devki Iyer for appellant.
Mr. F.I. Irani i/b. A.K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 23RD JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel or the revenue and the respondent. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that so far as the first question is concerned, the same is covered by the judgment of this Court delivered in the case of CIT V/s.General Insurance Corporation of India Ltd. (No.2)reported in 254 I.T.R. 204. Whereas the second question raised is covered by another judgment of this Court in the case of Otis Elevator Co. (India) Ltd.v/s. CIT. reported in 195 ITR 682. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue