Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/539/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/539/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. N.g.c. Network (India) Pvt.ltd

High Court 13 Oct 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/539/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. N.g.c. Network (India) Pvt.ltd
Date of order
13 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/539/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. N.g.c. Network (India) Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: Assuming that the re-assessment proceedings were valid, yet, on merits, the issue having been answered in the companion *2* judgment, nothing survives in these Appeals and they are disposed of in terms of our judgment.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.539 OF 2012WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.595 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-11,Mumbai. ..Appellant -Versus-N.G.C. Network (India)Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent ........... Mr. P. C. Chhotaray for the Appellant. Mr. Porus Kaka, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Divesh Chawla with Mr. A. K. Jasani for the Respondent. ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND A. K. MENON, JJ. DATE :- 13[th] OCTOBER, 2014 P.C.: 1]Having held that the question of law (b) which is similar to the one framed in the companion Income Tax Appeal No.538 of 2012, in which the judgment has been pronounced today and the said question being answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue, that we are of the opinion that no finding or answer is required to be given on question (a). Assuming that the re-assessment proceedings were valid, yet, on merits, the issue having been answered in the companion *2* judgment, nothing survives in these Appeals and they are disposed of in terms of our judgment. There would be no orders as to costs. (A. K. MENON, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) wadhwa
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan