Case Law › High Court › Itxa/541/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/541/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cntral-Ii,Mum v. Siltap Chemicals Limited

High Court 30 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

30 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/541/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cntral-Ii,Mum v. Siltap Chemicals Limited, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: DEVADHAR JJ.DATE : 30TH SEPTEMBER 2008 P.C.- questions raised by the revenue deserve consideration.Appeal is dismissed..Parties to act on the copy of this order dulyauthenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary ofthe Court..Certified copy is expedited.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.541 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central II, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai 40...Appellantv/sM/s Siltap Chemicals Ltd.,Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 ...Respondents Mr Suresh Kumar for Appellant. Mr Damodar i/b M/s Kanga and Co. for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ.DATE : 30TH SEPTEMBER 2008 P.C.- questions raised by the revenue deserve consideration.Appeal is dismissed..Parties to act on the copy of this order dulyauthenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary ofthe Court..Certified copy is expedited. ( D.K. DESHMUKH J.)( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.