Itxa/543/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 20, Mumbai v. M/S Choudhary Garments
High Court
14 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/543/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 20, Mumbai v. M/S Choudhary Garments
Date of order
14 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/543/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 20, Mumbai v. M/S Choudhary Garments, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The question of law raised in this appeal is whether the tribunal was justified in treating the interest on FDR as business income of the petitioner, so as to allow deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act to the assessee which is a 100% EOU.
Decision: In this view of the matter, thee is no merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AGK
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.543 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
City - 20, Mumbai ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Choudhary Garments ..Respondent.
Mr.R. Asokan for the Appellant.
Mr.A.K. Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C. :
1. The question of law raised in this appeal
is whether the tribunal was justified in treating
the interest on FDR as business income of the
petitioner, so as to allow deduction under Section
80HHC of the Income Tax Act to the assessee which
is a 100% EOU. According to the revenue, in the
light of the decision of this Court in the case of
CIT V/s. Ravi Ratna Exports Private Limited
reported in 246 ITR 443, the interest on FDR cannot
be treated as business income.
2. In the present case, on perusal of the
assessment order it is seen that the interest on
FDR has been in fact assessed as business income.
That finding of the assessing officer has attained
finality. Therefore, the decision of this Court in
the case of Ravi Ratna Exports Private Limited
(supra) has no application to the facts of the
present case. Moreover, this Court in the case of
CIT V/s. Punit Commercials Limited reported in 245
ITR 550 has held that the interest income received
by 100% EOU pertaining to export business is a
business income for the purpose of computing
deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax
Act.
3. In this view of the matter, thee is no
merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.