Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/5439/2010 Of The Director Of Income...

Itxa/5439/2010 Of The Director Of Income Tax International Taxation v. Federal Express Corporation Usa Mumbai

High Court 23 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5439/2010 Of The Director Of Income Tax International Taxation v. Federal Express Corporation Usa Mumbai
Date of order
23 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/5439/2010 Of The Director Of Income Tax International Taxation v. Federal Express Corporation Usa Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1715 OF 2009 The Director of Income Tax(International Taxation) ..Appellant. V/s. Federal Express Corporaton, US ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.Poras Kaka, senior Advocate for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 23RD JULY, 2009. P.C. :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. 2.The learned counsel for the revenue states that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) V/s. NGC Netwock Asia LLC reported in (2009) 222 CTR (Bom.) 86. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan