Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/5451/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/5451/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv Pune v. Walchandnagar Sahakari Bank Ltd

High Court 04 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5451/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv Pune v. Walchandnagar Sahakari Bank Ltd
Date of order
04 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/5451/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv Pune v. Walchandnagar Sahakari Bank Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1778 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Walchandnagar Sahakari Bank Ltd.Mrs. Devki Iyer for appellant. ..Respondent. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 4TH AUGUST, 2009. P.C. :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. At the instance of the revenue, appeal is taken up for hearing. 2.Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. The Solapur Nagari Audyogic SahakariBank Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.46 OF 2008 decided on 16th June, 2009 (unreported). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan