In Itxa/545/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 Mumbai v. Fashionportals (India) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 545 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
V/s.
Fashionportals (India) Pvt.Ltd.... Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.
Ms.Asifa Khan for the respondent.
DATED : 9[th] June 2009.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
After having gone through the impugned judgment of the Tribunal in general and para- 9.1 in particular, the question of law sought to be raised revolves around the appreciation of evidence. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue