Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/550/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/550/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. M/S. Moosajee Jeevajee And Co. Mumbai

High Court 29 Jun 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/550/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. M/S. Moosajee Jeevajee And Co. Mumbai
Date of order
29 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/550/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. M/S. Moosajee Jeevajee And Co. Mumbai, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 550 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-13,MumbaiVERSUS .. Appellant M/s Moosajee Jeevajee & Co. .. Respondent …. None for the Appellant. …. CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE : 29 JUNE, 2018 P.C. :- .When this appeal was first called out none appeared insupport of the appeal thus, kept back at the end of the board. Whenthe appeal was again called out none appeared on behalf of theappeal. It appears that, the appellant is not interested in prosecutingthe present appeal. This is more particularly so as the parties andadvocates were put notice on 15[th] June, 2018 that this appeal shallbe taken up for consideration today. In the above view appeal isdismissed for non-prosecution. [ SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan