Itxa/553/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20, Mumbai v. M/S Manohar Clothiers
High Court
20 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/553/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20, Mumbai v. M/S Manohar Clothiers
Date of order
20 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/553/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20, Mumbai v. M/S Manohar Clothiers, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AGK
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.553 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
City - 20, Mumbai ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Manohar Clothiers ..Respondents.
Mr.R. Asokan for the appellant.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 20TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
2. The questions raised in this appeal
pertain to the deletion of the additions made by
the assessing officer on the ground that there is
inflation in purchases as well as in making charges
for the period prior to 1-4-1997. The findings
recorded by the tribunal for deleting the additions
is that there is no evidence to show that the
purchases and making charges have been inflated.
In the case of group concerns, similar additions
made by the assessing officer have been deleted by
the tribunal and the appeals filed by the revenue
against the said orders have been dismissed by this
Court on the ground of delay.
3. In these circumstances, the decision of
the tribunal being based on facts, there is no
substantial question of law arising from the order
of the Tribunal. Hence, dismissed.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.