Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/553/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/553/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20, Mumbai v. M/S Manohar Clothiers

High Court 20 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/553/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20, Mumbai v. M/S Manohar Clothiers
Date of order
20 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/553/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20, Mumbai v. M/S Manohar Clothiers, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AGK ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.553 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, City - 20, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Manohar Clothiers ..Respondents. Mr.R. Asokan for the appellant. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 20TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The questions raised in this appeal pertain to the deletion of the additions made by the assessing officer on the ground that there is inflation in purchases as well as in making charges for the period prior to 1-4-1997. The findings recorded by the tribunal for deleting the additions is that there is no evidence to show that the purchases and making charges have been inflated. In the case of group concerns, similar additions made by the assessing officer have been deleted by the tribunal and the appeals filed by the revenue against the said orders have been dismissed by this Court on the ground of delay. 3. In these circumstances, the decision of the tribunal being based on facts, there is no substantial question of law arising from the order of the Tribunal. Hence, dismissed. D.K. DESHMUKH, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan