Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/557/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/557/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-13,Mum v. M/S Fourways International

High Court 19 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/557/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-13,Mum v. M/S Fourways International
Date of order
19 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/557/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-13,Mum v. M/S Fourways International, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Issue: These appeals were admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- a) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal is right in holding that the activity of the respondent is the manufacturing activity and therefore deduction u/s.

Decision: Both the appeals are accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.55 OF 2007AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.557 OF 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.55 OF 2007 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.557 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Fourways International ..Respondent. Dr.A.S.Shivram for appellant. None present for respondent. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2009. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. These appeals were admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- a) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal is right in holding that the activity of the respondent is the manufacturing activity and therefore deduction u/s. 80-IB is admissible ? b) Whether in the facts and circumstance of the case and in law the activity of cutting of jumbo tape rolls into smaller sizes is manufacturing activity or processing activity ? 2. It is not in dispute that the issue as to whether the activity of cutting jumbo tape rolls into smaller sizes amounts to manufacturing activity has been considered by the Supreme Court in the case of Kores India Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of CentralExcise, Chennai reported in 2004 (174) E.L.T. 7(S.C.). In this view of the matter, the above Kores India Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai (S.C.) questions are answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 3. Both the appeals are accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan