Case Law › High Court › Itxa/559/2003 Of M/S Kantilal And Co v....

Itxa/559/2003 Of M/S Kantilal And Co v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circle-19, Mumbai

High Court 16 Jun 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

16 Jun 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/559/2003 Of M/S Kantilal And Co v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circle-19, Mumbai, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 559 OF 2003 M/s. M. Kantilal & Co. … Appellants V/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-19,Mumbai ... Respondent Mr. Atul Jasani for the Appellants CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : 16 JUNE 2022 P.C.:- The learned Counsel for the Appellants states that theAppellants have taken away the papers from him on long time backand he has no instructions. No alternate arrangement has beenmade. The Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. N.R. BORKAR, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.