Itxa/566/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii v. Sunil M.makhija
High Court
17 Apr 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/566/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii v. Sunil M.makhija
Date of order
17 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/566/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii v. Sunil M.makhija, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeals are allowed to be withdrawn anddismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.566 OF 2009The Commissioner of Income Tax..AppellantVs.Sunil M.Makhija..RespondentMr.Bhatnagar i/b.N.R.Prajapati for appellant.Dr.Daniel a/w.Mr.M.Subramanian & Mr.V.S.Hadade forrespondent.WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.361 OF 2009The Commissioner of Income Tax..AppellantVs.Hasmukh Mulji Dodhia..RespondentMr.Bhatnagar i/b.N.R.Prajapati for appellant.Mr.Ajay R.Singh for respondent.CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 17TH APRIL,2009P.C..Since the tax effect involved in the aboveappeals is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, learned Counselfor appellant seeks leave to withdraw the aboveappeals. The appeals are allowed to be withdrawn anddismissed as such. Permissible Court Fees be refundedto the appellant, as per rules.(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue