Itxa/5677/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8,Mum v. M/S Akash Ston Industries Ltd
High Court
18 Aug 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5677/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8,Mum v. M/S Akash Ston Industries Ltd
Date of order
18 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/5677/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8,Mum v. M/S Akash Ston Industries Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2,The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.401 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Akash Stone Industries Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 18 AUGUST 2010
P.C. :-
1. The appeal was dismissed for non removal of office objections in pursuance to the conditional order dated 24 March, 2009 by the Prothonotary and Senior Master. At the request of learned counsel for the Revenue, office objections are waived and the appeal is restored to file, taken on board and is called out. Counsel for the Revenue seeks leave to withdraw the appeal since the issue stands covered against the Revenue by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Income-Tax Officer V/s. Arihant Tiles and Marbles P. Ltd. [2010] 302 ITR 79 (SC).
2,The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be refund of Court fee, if any, as per Rules.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue