Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/5700/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/5700/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10,Mumbai v. M/S. Aarti Industries Ltd.,Mumbai

High Court 24 Sep 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5700/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10,Mumbai v. M/S. Aarti Industries Ltd.,Mumbai
Date of order
24 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/5700/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10,Mumbai v. M/S. Aarti Industries Ltd.,Mumbai, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

itxa5700-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5700 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-10, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Aarti Industries Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Arvind Pinto for the appellant. Dr. K. Shivram with Paras S. Savla for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.DATED : 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2012 P.C. :- 1.The question of law raised in this appeal by the revenue reads thus :- “ Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was correct in holding that the re-opening u/s.147 was bad in law, since all materials relevant for assessment had been disclosed ignoring that the reopening was based on the amendment of Section 80HHC in relation to DEPB receipts by Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2005 with retrospective effect ? ” 2.Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised by the revenue in the case of CIT V/s. M/s. K.Mohan & Co. (Exports) (Regd) [Income tax Appeal (L) No.2347 of 2010 and Income tax Appeal No.1263 of 2011] has been dismissed by this Court on 1[st] July, 2011. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan