Itxa/570/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Vii, Mumbai v. Ruby Mills Ltd
High Court
08 Oct 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/570/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Vii, Mumbai v. Ruby Mills Ltd
Date of order
08 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/570/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Vii, Mumbai v. Ruby Mills Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 570 OF 2003.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 570 OF 2003.
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Mumbai City-VII ..Appellant.
V/s.
The Ruby Mills Ltd.Ruby House ..Respondent.
Mr Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr Miraj Sheth i/b Rajesh Shah & Co. for the
Respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND V.C.DAGA, JJ.
AND V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED: 08th OCTOBER, 2008.
DATED: 08th OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.:
P.C.:----
----
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant
and the learned counsel for the Respondent.
2. The learned counsel for the Appellant contends
that as the tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, he
seeks leave to withdraw the above appeal. The appeal
is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
3. Permissible court fee be refunded to the
Appellant as per rules.
(V.C. DAGA,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue