In Itxa/571/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Pune v. Shrigonda Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: KUMBHAKONI, J.DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2008.PC :- 1.As the questions of law raisedin this appeal raised in this appealhave already been decided by thisCourt against the department in thejudgment reported in 301 ITR 191(Bom.), present appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 571 OF 2007
_____________________________________________________Office Notes, Office :Memorandum of Coram, :Appearance, Court’s:Court’s ordersorders of directions :or Judge’sand Prothonotary’s orderorders-----------------------------------------------------
Mr. Vimal Gupta, for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, &A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2008.PC :-
1.As the questions of law raisedin this appeal raised in this appealhave already been decided by thisCourt against the department in thejudgment reported in 301 ITR 191(Bom.), present appeal is dismissed.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue