In Itxa/571/2011 Of M/S.icici Securities Limited v. Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-4(1) And 1 Anr, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Issue: The appeal is admitted on the following question of law :- " Whether the Tribunal was right in law in denying depreciation to the appellant on the BSE and NSE Stock Exchange cards ? " 2.Counsel for the parties state that the above question stands answer in favour of the appellant-assessee by the Ape...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.571 OF 2011
ICICI Securities Ltd.
..Appellant.
V/s.
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-40(1), Mumbai
..Respondent.
Ms. A. Vissanji with S.J. Mehta for the appellant.Mr. Vimal Gupta for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ.DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Heard. The appeal is admitted on the following question of
law :-
" Whether the Tribunal was right in law in denying depreciation to the appellant on the BSE and NSE Stock Exchange cards ? "
2.Counsel for the parties state that the above question stands answer in favour of the appellant-assessee by the Apex Court in the case of Techno Shares and Stocks Ltd. V/s. CIT reported in [2010] 327
ITR 323 (SC). Accordingly, the question is answered in favour of the appellant-assessee and against the revenue. The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.