Itxa/5714/2010 Of The Commissiner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. Otis Elevator Co (I) Ltd
High Court
21 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5714/2010 Of The Commissiner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. Otis Elevator Co (I) Ltd
Date of order
21 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/5714/2010 Of The Commissiner Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. Otis Elevator Co (I) Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5714 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
Otis Elevator Co. (I) Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. F.D. Andhyarujina, senior Advocate with B.G. Yewale i/b. Rajesh Shah & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ.
DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2011
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised by
the revenue in the case of CIT V/s. M/s. Otis Elevator reported in Income Tax Appeal No.1685 of 2009 has been rejected by this Court on 17th September, 2009. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue