Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/579/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/579/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-20,Mum v. Shri Krpashankar Chaturvedi

High Court 19 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/579/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-20,Mum v. Shri Krpashankar Chaturvedi
Date of order
19 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
1996-97
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/579/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-20,Mum v. Shri Krpashankar Chaturvedi, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 579 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-20 .. Appellant v/s. Kripashankar Chaturvedi .. Respondent None for the appellant None for the respondent P.C. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.J. DATED : 19[th] JANUARY, 2016. 1.This appeal relates to Assessment Year 1996-97. None appears in support of the appeal. It appears that the Revenue is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Moreover, we notice that in para 11 of the Appeal Memo, the tax effect involved is Rs. 12.98 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No.21/15 dated 10[th ]December, 2015, the Revenue it seems is not interested in pursuing this appeal. 2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan