Case Law › High Court › Itxa/586/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/586/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Iii v. Rama Newsprint & Papers Ltd

High Court 12 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

12 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/586/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Iii v. Rama Newsprint & Papers Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.586 OF 2001The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.Rama Newsprint & Papers Ltd...Respondent.Mr.B.M.Chatrterji with Mrs. P.P. Bhosale andMr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.R. Murlidhar i/by Dhru & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY,2008. PC : 1. The questions of law are framed in Para-5 of the appeal memo. the question of law as framed would not arise. framed would not arise and consequently, the appeal dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.