In Itxa/5868/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. Warkem, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1986 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,V/s.M/s.Warkem.
... Appellant.
... Respondent.
None for the appellant.V.S.Hadade for the respondent.
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 2nd September 2009. P.C. :
None for the appellant. Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue