Itxa/5869/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv Pune v. The Solapur Janta Sah Bank Ltd
High Court
26 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5869/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv Pune v. The Solapur Janta Sah Bank Ltd
Date of order
26 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/5869/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv Pune v. The Solapur Janta Sah Bank Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1990 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.
The Solapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.Ms. Aasifa Khan for respondent.
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1991 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.
Lokmangal Co-op. Bank Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeals. The appeals are taken up for admission at the instance of learned counsel for the revenue.
2.Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. The Solapur Nagari Audyogic Sahakari Bank Ltd.in Income Tax Appeal No.46 OF 2008 decided on 16th June, 2009 (unreported). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.