In Itxa/5874/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 10 Mumbai v. Kodak India Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1907 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Kodak India Ltd.
..Respondent.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble for appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. Appeal is taken up for admission by consent of the parties.
2.After hearing the rival parties to the appeal, learned counsel for the revenue fairly admits that the issue sought to be raised in the above appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Otis ElavatorCo. (India) Ltd. V/s. C.I.T.reported in 195 I.T.R. 682 (Bom.). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.