Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/5885/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/5885/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 Mumbai v. M/S. Mangatram Arora Finance Ltd

High Court 26 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5885/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 Mumbai v. M/S. Mangatram Arora Finance Ltd
Date of order
26 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/5885/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 Mumbai v. M/S. Mangatram Arora Finance Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 5.In the result, the appeal is dismissed in limini being devoid of any substance with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2031 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. M/s. Mangatram Arora Finance Ltd. ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mrs. Padma Divekar for appellant. None for respondent. P.C. :- CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH AUGUST, 2009. 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. Appeal is taken up for admission at the instance of learned counsel for the revenue. 2.Perused the impugned order. The issue sought to be raised revolves around the question of cancellation of penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act,1961 as a result of quantum deletion. 3.Learned counsel for the revenue states that the department has not challenged the order deleting quantum additions. 4.Considering the observations made by the Tribunal in paragraph 9 of the impugned order and acceptance of quantum deletion by the Revenue, we do not see any substantial question of law warranting adjudication by this Court. 5.In the result, the appeal is dismissed in limini being devoid of any substance with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan