Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/5915/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/5915/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 Mumbai v. Kjmc Capital Market Services Ltd

High Court 16 Oct 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/5915/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 Mumbai v. Kjmc Capital Market Services Ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/5915/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 Mumbai v. Kjmc Capital Market Services Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law:- “ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that depreciation u/s.32 of the Income Tax Act is allowable on the membership of the Stock Exchange ? " 2.By consent of part...

Decision: Having heard both counsel for the parties, appeal is allowed for the reasons recorded in the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.971 of2006[CIT V/s.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2311 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. KJMC Capital Market Services Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. The appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law:- “ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that depreciation u/s.32 of the Income Tax Act is allowable on the membership of the Stock Exchange ? " 2.By consent of parties, appeal is taken up for final hearing. Having heard both counsel for the parties, appeal is allowed for the reasons recorded in the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.971 of2006[CIT V/s. M/s. Techno Shares & Stocks Ltd. (with other matters) decided on 11[th] September, 2009 since the questions sought to be raised relate to the depreciation with regard to BSE membership card. The question is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. No order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan