Itxa/592/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Pune v. M/S.sharada Erectors Private Limited
High Court
05 Oct 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/592/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Pune v. M/S.sharada Erectors Private Limited
Date of order
05 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
2004-05, 2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/592/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Pune v. M/S.sharada Erectors Private Limited, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 592 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III,Pune
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Sharada Erectors Pvt. Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S.KULKARNI, J.J.
DATED : 5[th] OCTOBER, 2016.
P.C.
1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges a common impugned order dated 25[th] June, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06. This appeal relates to Assessment Year 2004-05.
2.Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue very fairly states that the Revenue's appeal from a common impugned order dated 25[th] June, 2013 to the extent it relates to Assessment Year 2005-06, was a subject matter of consideration by this
Court in Income Tax Appeal No.680 of 2014. On the above question, this Court by an order dated 3[rd] October, 2016 found that the identical questions as raised herein did not give rise to any substantial question of law. Thus, did not entertain the appeal.
3.For the reasons recorded in our order dated 3[rd] October, 2016 passed in Income Tax Appeal No.680 of 2014 filed by the Revenue against the same respondent assessee for A.Y. 2005-06, the present appeal also does not give rise to any substantial question of law. Thus, not entertained.
4.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.