In Itxa/5924/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, -4 Mumbai v. Siddhivinayak Filaments Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2359 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax.... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Siddhivinayak Filaments Pvt.Ltd.
... Respondent.
Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
P.C. :
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 7[th] November 2009.
Office objections are overruled. Office to register the appeal. Appeal is taken up for hearing at the request of the appellant. Perused appeal
2.Learned counsel for appellant- revenue fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CITV/s. Emptee Poly-Yarn P. Ltd.reported in (2008) 305 ITR 309 (Bom.) against the revenue. In this view of the matter, we see no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue