In Itxa/596/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Mumbai v. M/S. Ridge Investment Co. Private Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.826 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Ridge Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd...Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for appellant.None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 18TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register to appeal.
2.The appeal is taken up for hearing at the
request of learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the judgment in the case of S.A. BuildersLtd. V/s. C.I.T. reported in 288 I.T.R. 1 (S.C.). The same judgment has been relied upon by the Tribunal. He further submits that there is no justification for making
such disallowances. In this view of the matter, no substantial question arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.