Itxa/601/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-21, Mumbai v. Belasura Indl Estate
High Court
26 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/601/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-21, Mumbai v. Belasura Indl Estate
Date of order
26 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/601/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-21, Mumbai v. Belasura Indl Estate, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.601 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
City 21, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
Belasura Industrial Estate .. Respondent.
Mr.R. Asokan i/b. S.S. Sarkar for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 26TH OCTOBER, 2004.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 26TH OCTOBER, 2004.
P.C. :
Heard.
2. The controversy raised in this appeal
stands concluded by the division bench judgment of
this Court in the case of Cadell Weaving Mills Co.
P. Ltd. V/s. CIT [249 ITR 265]. However, the
learned counsel for the revenue submits that the said
judgment is under challenge before the Supreme Court.
Even if that be so in so far as we are concerned, the
controversy stands concluded by the division bench
judgment of this Court.
3. No substantial question of law arises in
this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue