In Itxa/606/2002 Of Sigma Paints Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3As such, the appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDITION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.606 OF 2002
Sigma Paints Ltd. ...Appellant
V/s.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Special Range-14, Mumbai & Anr. ...Respondents
.....
Mr.Balasaheb Yewale I/by Mr.Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocate for the Appellant.
Miss.Samiksha Kanani with Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent.
....
CORAM :S.V.GANGAPURWALA &A.M.BADAR JJ.
6[th] July 2017.
DATED :
P.C.
1The learned counsel for the Appellant states that he does not have any instructions in the matter.
2It appears that the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
3As such, the appeal stands dismissed for non
prosecution.
( A.M.BADAR J.)
( S.V.GANGAPURWALA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue