Itxa/606/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -I, Thane v. M/S Son Am B Uilders
High Court
01 Oct 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/606/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -I, Thane v. M/S Son Am B Uilders
Date of order
01 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/606/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -I, Thane v. M/S Son Am B Uilders, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: 2] In view thereof, the Revenue's Appeal is disposed of in terms of this 1/2 *2* judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
*1*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.606 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Thane.-Versus-M/s. Sonam Builders
..Appellant
..Respondent
...........
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant.Ms. Beena Pillai for the Respondent.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
AND A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE :- 1[st] OCTOBER, 2014
P.C.:
1]When this Appeal was mentioned before us, the parties proceeded on the footing that the substantial question of law on which this Appeal is admitted, stands answered and covered by our judgment and order in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax-16 V/s. Happy Home Enterprises in Income Tax Appeal No.201 of 2012 and The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, Mumbai V/s. Kanakia Spaces Pvt. Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.308 of 2012, both decided on 19[th ]September, 2014.
2] In view thereof, the Revenue's Appeal is disposed of in terms of this
1/2
*2*
judgment. Meaning thereby, the questions which have been raised, stand answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
wadhwa
2/2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.