Case Law › High Court › Itxa/607/2008 Of The Commissioner Oincom...

Itxa/607/2008 Of The Commissioner Oincome-Tax-3 v. M/S Chandragupta Traders Pvt Ltd

High Court 07 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Oct 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/607/2008 Of The Commissioner Oincome-Tax-3 v. M/S Chandragupta Traders Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The learned counsel for both the sides agree Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as tocosts. .Parties to act on the copy of this order dulyauthenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary ofthe Court. .

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.607 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-3,Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai 400 020...Appellantv/sM/s Chandragupta Traders Pvt.Ltd.,Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 ...Respondents Mr Vimal Gupta for Appellant. Mr J.D. Mistry with Mr P.C. Tripathi i/b Mr Raj darakfor Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ.DATE : 7TH OCTOBER 2008 P.C.- 1. The learned counsel for both the sides agree Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as tocosts. .Parties to act on the copy of this order dulyauthenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary ofthe Court. . Certified copy is expedited. ( D.K. DESHMUKH J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.