Itxa/611/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv Pune v. The Malegaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
High Court
07 Feb 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/611/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv Pune v. The Malegaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
Date of order
07 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/611/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iv Pune v. The Malegaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 itxal1032-10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1032 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Pune
..Appellant.
V/s.
The Malegaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.
Mr. S.N. Inamdar for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Counsel on both sides agree that in view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Nashik V/s. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar SSK Ltd. reported in [2010] 189 Taxman 81 (SC), the decision of the ITAT dated 30/11/2009 is required to be quashed and set aside and the matter is required to be restored to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (A) for deciding the question raised in this appeal afresh in accordance with law. Accordingly, the order of the ITAT dated 30/11/2009 passed in I.T.A. No.1207/PN/2009 for A.Y. 2006-07 is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the
file of Commissioner of Income Tax (A) for deciding the question raised in this appeal afresh in accordance with law.
2.The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.