Case Law › High Court › Itxa/6154/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/6154/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S The Swastik Safe Deposit And Investment Ltd. , Mumbai

High Court 05 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

05 Sep 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/6154/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S The Swastik Safe Deposit And Investment Ltd. , Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas 1 itxa6154-10 N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6154 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. The Swastik Safe Deposit & Investment Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr. J.D. Mistri, senior advocate with Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATED : 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C. :- Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised by the revenue in the assessee’s own case in Income Tax Appeal No.1132 of 2001 has been dismissed by us today i.e. 5[th] September, 2011. For the reasons therein, the present appeal is also dismissed. (K.K. TATED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.