In Itxa/618/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Gaylord Investments And Traidng Co Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.618 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-3,Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai 400 020...Appellantv/sM/s Gaylord Investments and TradingCo.Pvt.Ltd., Nariman Point,Mumbai 400 021 ...Respondents
Mr Vimal Gupta for Appellant.
Mr J.D. Mistry with Mr P.C. Tripathi i/b Mr Raj darak
for Respondents.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ.DATE : 7TH OCTOBER 2008
P.C.-
1.
In this appeal, four questions are raised by
entertained. Appeal is dismissed with no order as to
costs.
.
Parties to act on the copy of this order duly
authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary of
the Court.
.
Certified copy is expedited.
( D.K. DESHMUKH J.)
( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue