Itxa/6/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Dodsal Pvt. Ltd
High Court
21 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/6/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Dodsal Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
21 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/6/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Dodsal Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.For the aforesaid reasons, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
The Commissioner of Income....Appellant
M/s.Dodsal Pvt.Ltd....Respondent.
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar, for appellant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Ms.A.Vissanji i/b. A.K.Jasani,for Respondent.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C.:-
1.The revenue has raised four questions inthis appeal. So far as the question (a) is concerned,the learned Counsel appearing for appellant statesthat similar question raised by the revenue in TaxAppeal no.402 of 2008 has been dismissed by this
Court on 20.10.2008. Hence, appeal against the firstquestion cannot be entertained.
2.As regards question (b), (c) and (d) are
concerned, the learned Counsel appearing forappellant fairly states that similar questions raisedin Income Tax appeal no.403 of 2008 has beendismissed by us today i.e. on 21.10.2008.
3.For the aforesaid reasons, the appeal is
dismissed. No order as to costs.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue